role in a complex environment.
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2024 9:59 am
The core is related to perspective. If you regard tanks as mobile cannons, you can’t see blitzkrieg. Jumping to history to make an analogy, no matter how many dynasties there are, no matter how many prime ministers are replaced, in the framework of Mr. Qian Mu’s "Political Gains and Losses of Successive Dynasties", the steam engine cannot be invented (Confucius came out of the Dark Ages in the late Qing Dynasty, and it was less than 30 years before the invention of the steam engine). The first reliance of I iv applications (intelligent native applications) is of course the need for the model itself to jump up, and it also requires a new way of thinking, a new methodology, and a new way of measurement.
If you think that you can create a smart native japan cell number application just like you can create a web page, it is probably the same as it will take thousands of years to create a steam engine. Thinking itself limits your vision. Limiting your vision will lead to turning a blind eye. Let's go back to the most easily understood perspective of replacing people and software to think about smart native applications and look at the new productivity and production relationship tools from this perspective. Whether this kind of smart native application exists is not the key.
The key is whether it can completely cover aintelligence of I are interchangeable. Interchangeability means that if the intelligence is not enough, the boundaries of the role can be smaller and it can be used. What can we see from this perspective? For example, can the end completely replace recruitment, operation and maintenance, finance, marketing and other positions in the company? Can the entire company enter the state of automatic driving? In the industry, it is a general model + vertical model + can it replace lawyers, doctors, pharmaceutical scientists, etc.
If you think that you can create a smart native japan cell number application just like you can create a web page, it is probably the same as it will take thousands of years to create a steam engine. Thinking itself limits your vision. Limiting your vision will lead to turning a blind eye. Let's go back to the most easily understood perspective of replacing people and software to think about smart native applications and look at the new productivity and production relationship tools from this perspective. Whether this kind of smart native application exists is not the key.
The key is whether it can completely cover aintelligence of I are interchangeable. Interchangeability means that if the intelligence is not enough, the boundaries of the role can be smaller and it can be used. What can we see from this perspective? For example, can the end completely replace recruitment, operation and maintenance, finance, marketing and other positions in the company? Can the entire company enter the state of automatic driving? In the industry, it is a general model + vertical model + can it replace lawyers, doctors, pharmaceutical scientists, etc.